logologologo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Litigation and Trial Practice
    • Business and Commercial Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law
    • Employment Law
    • Elections & Government Affairs
    • Administrative Law
    • Probate and Estate Planning
  • Legal Team
    • Thomas A. Denker
    • David Ruiz
    • Andrew H. Barbour
    • John G. Anderson
    • Jeffry H. Jacobson
    • Steve W. Bloch
  • Law Journal
  • Contact Us

Click here to make a payment

logologologo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Litigation and Trial Practice
    • Business and Commercial Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law
    • Employment Law
    • Elections & Government Affairs
    • Administrative Law
    • Probate and Estate Planning
  • Legal Team
    • Thomas A. Denker
    • David Ruiz
    • Andrew H. Barbour
    • John G. Anderson
    • Jeffry H. Jacobson
    • Steve W. Bloch
  • Law Journal
  • Contact Us

Click here to make a payment

logologologo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Litigation and Trial Practice
    • Business and Commercial Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law
    • Employment Law
    • Elections & Government Affairs
    • Administrative Law
    • Probate and Estate Planning
  • Legal Team
    • Thomas A. Denker
    • David Ruiz
    • Andrew H. Barbour
    • John G. Anderson
    • Jeffry H. Jacobson
    • Steve W. Bloch
  • Law Journal
  • Contact Us

Click here to make a payment

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Litigation and Trial Practice
    • Business and Commercial Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • International Law
    • Employment Law
    • Elections & Government Affairs
    • Administrative Law
    • Probate and Estate Planning
  • Legal Team
    • Thomas A. Denker
    • David Ruiz
    • Andrew H. Barbour
    • John G. Anderson
    • Jeffry H. Jacobson
    • Steve W. Bloch
  • Law Journal
  • Contact Us
by admin
Arizona Case LawAugust 17, 20230 comments

Arizona Supreme Court Holds that Builders Cannot Waive the Implied Warranty of Habitability

In a recent decision, the Arizona Supreme Court held that builders cannot waive the implied warranty of habitability in a purchase agreement with a homebuyer.  The case, Zambrano v. M & RC II LLC, 517 P.3d 1168 (2022), involved a homebuyer who sued a builder for breach of the implied warranty of habitability after discovering numerous defects in her new home.

Please click this link if you wish to learn more about real estate litigation, construction defects, and how Munger • Denker • Ruiz • Barbour‘s attorneys can help you.

House with possible construction defects

The Facts

Tina Zambrano purchased a new home from M & RC II LLC in 2020.  Shortly after moving in, Zambrano began to notice numerous defects in the home, including:

  • Popped nails in the drywall
  • Defects affecting the home’s foundation, such as soil preparation, grading, and drainage
  • Leaks in the roof
  • Improper installation of the HVAC system

Zambrano contacted M & RC II about the defects, but the company refused to repair them.  Zambrano then filed a lawsuit against M & RC II, alleging a breach of the implied warranty of habitability.

The Law

Arizona law implies a warranty of habitability in every contract for the sale of a new home.  This warranty means that the builder warrants that the home is fit for human habitation and free from latent defects.  If the home is not fit for habitation, the homebuyer may be entitled to damages, including the cost of repairs or the cost of moving to a new home.

The Decision

The Arizona Supreme Court held that the builder could not escape liability under the implied warranty of habitability by including a waiver of the warranty in the contract with the homebuyer.  The court found that the public policy of protecting homebuyers from defective homes outweighed the builder’s interest in being able to limit its liability.

Conclusion

The Arizona Supreme Court’s decision in Zambrano v. M & RC II LLC is a significant victory for homebuyers.  The decision ensures that homebuyers will have a remedy if they purchase a new home that is defective.  This is an essential protection for homebuyers and a reminder that builders must construct homes that are fit for human habitation.

The attorneys at Munger • Denker • Ruiz • Barbour stay up-to-date on all aspects of construction law in Arizona.  Our attorneys know that your time and money are valuable, and will work to resolve your matter efficiently and effectively, both in and out of court.

Contact Us
Tags:
Arizona Attorney Builders Construction Defect Homeowners Lawyer Phoenix Tucson
Share
Anatomy of a Civil Lawsuit in ArizonaPrev
Kalway v. Calabria Ranch HOA, LLC:  What Does It Mean for Homeowners in Arizona?Next

Latest Posts

by admin

Quiet Title

Normally, it is simple to determine who is the lawful owner of real property:  Whoever is listed on the last deed recorded with the county recorder’s...

Quiet Title

May 8, 2024
Share
by admin

Safeguarding Your Interests in Arizona Probate Court

What Is Probate Court? A probate court is one that has authority or jurisdiction over all cases involving wills, trusts, estates, and...

Safeguarding Your Interests in Arizona Probate Court

Probate LawApril 25, 2024
Share

Call Now to Schedule a Consultation

Tucson

(520) 721-1900


Phoenix

(602) 374-4890

Journal Topics

  • Arizona Case Law
  • Business Law
  • Civil Litigation
  • Law 101
  • Legal News
  • Meet Your Team
  • Probate Law
  • Real Estate Law
Reader's Choice 2024 Winner Best Law Firm
U.S. News Best Law Firms 2023 Award Badge
Arizona lawyers providing the very best legal services.

For Clients Who Expect the Very Best

Munger • Denker • Ruiz • Barbour
Main Office:
333 N. Wilmot Rd., Ste. 300
Tucson, AZ 85711

© 2023-2025 Munger • Denker • Ruiz • Barbour.  All Rights Reserved.